Eighteenth-century birth registries list a surprisingly large number of “unwed” Jewish mothers, but immorality wasn’t the issue

The friendly American yeshiva student who frequented the Central Archives to research his Bavarian ancestors found quite a few, but he was disturbed by the notation in a birth registry next to the name of a female relative: “unehelich” – unmarried. The young man frowned. No such fact had ever been mentioned in his family. He didn’t visit the archives again.

Traditionally, Jewish communities recorded marriages, divorces, deaths, and burials, but not births. Circumcisions were listed in the mohel’s (circumciser’s) personal notebook – though this information seldom reached community archives – but female births weren’t recorded, except in notes occasionally handwritten in Bibles or prayer books.

Toward the end of the 18th century, most of Europe began regulating the registration of births, marriages, and deaths. Among Jews, the registrar was usually the community rabbi or, if they were too few to have one, the local pastor (which explains why Jewish entries are sometimes found in church registries).

The Yiddish announcement from Lvov listing the detriments of unregistered marriage
The Yiddish announcement from Lvov listing the detriments of unregistered marriage

 

Unwed Mothers?

Some Jewish communities record surprisingly many “unwed” mothers, but this label doesn’t necessarily mean the community was less traditional or had looser moral standards than generally supposed.

Most of these women were in fact married by a rabbi in accordance with Jewish law and custom – but unbeknownst to the authorities. These “quiet weddings” came about because certain European countries limited the number of Jewish marriages, attempting to reduce their Jewish populations. Legislated mainly in the 18th century and repealed during the 19th, these quotas usually meant that only one son per family could be registered as married. In Prussia, for instance, a 1714 law allowed only one son to inherit his father’s residential rights; any brothers could marry only if they possessed considerable means and paid a hefty fine.

Not yet a Segula subscriber?

Access our full archive online, have print issues delivered to your door, and more
Subscribe now
Already a subscriber? Log in
Feel free to share